MyFox
 

AmyFOX

by witiwebprod1 from MyFoxMilwaukee

Last Post 4 days, 1 hour Ago


Could buying a Prius right now actually set you back $$ instead of saving money on gas?

Take a look at this article I found on cNet:
Do the math. A nicely equipped 2007 Honda Civic EX with equal mileage carries a suggested retail price of about $18,300. Assuming 30 miles per gallon for the Civic, and 45 miles per gallon for the Prius, it could take around 13 years to recoup the extra money for the Prius at $5 per gallon (assuming 12,000 miles per year of driving). Now I know that there are a lot of assumptions in this formula, but suffice it to say that when you do the math, the Civic seems like a better deal overall--not to mention that the EX has a Sunroof to boot.

Very interesting... maybe i'm not doing so bad with my 2007 Civic!
13 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 13
Page 1 of 1
mityhid read my blog
Jun 27, 2008 | 6:05 PM

That article is right. And it is not the first time I have heard that.
Honda and Toyota Hybrids are not very cost effective.
The most cost effective hybrid that I have heard of is the Ford Escape. Supposed to only take 4-5 years to recoup the exspence. Think I spelled that word wrong.

hahnmeister read my blog
Jun 30, 2008 | 2:27 PM

Well, at least that comparison has some logic behind it. Thing is, there are some details not being included in that.

A Prius costs about $22,000

A Civic costs anywhere from $16,000 all the way up to $26,000 (some even more), and alot of those 'options' are included in the price of the PRIUS. So you might want to compare apples to apples with this one.

So you may not have ANY money to make up for.

Also, depending on where you are, a PRIUS can have a switch that turns off the gas-engine all together and turns it into a plug-in hybrid. Then the savings can really add up because your daily driving can turn into 100% electric. All PRIUS's can actually be 'hacked' like this.

At least it isnt as absurd as the whole "My Hummer has less of an impact than your PRIUS"... a marketing scam that was later proven to be wrong by many research groups, including MIT.

mityhid read my blog
Jul 1, 2008 | 5:22 PM

I don't see how a plug-in car does anybody any good. Sure it eliminates the emissions from one vehicle. But it does add to the load of the power grid and the power plants, which as my recollection are still coal fired around here. And if enough people plug their cars in everyday it will just add more emissions that running them as a true hybrid.

mityhid read my blog
Jul 1, 2008 | 5:25 PM

Oh, and by the way, I looked on a dealer website, Prius go for 24,000 to 28,000. At least according to the sticker price. And I'll bet it is awfully hard to find used ones that aren't going for a premium.

hahnmeister read my blog
Jul 1, 2008 | 6:28 PM

Dealers are marking them up, but you can just buy one from Toyota for $21-22k.

A plug in car does alot of good. First of all, electric motor efficiency is many times greater than internal combustion, about 8x actually. Also, electricity is much cheaper for the energy it contains. Filling an Electric battery for a 300 mile range costs about $3-5 (depends on the weight and what state) to fill. Most people would charge their electrics (or series hybrids) at night, when the power supply is 'off peak' anyways. So it doesnt mean more generators so much as simply leaving them on longer at night. And charging a car isnt really much more stress than leaving an AC on overnight... its that little... its not 'thousands of thousands of watts'. So while you are correct that it does simply displace the need for energy onto the power grid, electric is so much more efficient in comparison and in the first place that its much less of a problem. If you took 1 gallon of gas (which you wouldnt do in the first place, but use some other source that is even more efficient) and converted it to electricity, and then use that in a car, you have an equal MPG rating of over 200mpg. So its alot like saying you can fill your gas tank with 1-2 gallons of gas if electric... thats less expense and pollution all around. And, while renewable energies are next to impossible to use on a mobile system (although some hybrids plan on using solar panels in the roof to help charge), with the electric grid, you have means to generate electricity w/o fuels/coal/etc. Nuclear, wind power, solar, geothermal

hahnmeister read my blog
Jul 1, 2008 | 6:29 PM

, etc. are all possible with electric. There are those who have electric cars already, and use solar panels at their house to charge them, so their 'net pollution' from their cars is 0. No gas, nothing. Also, it is much easier/effective to impliment pollution controls on large coal plant generators than on individual cars. Electric trumps the efficiency of hydrogen even, as hydrogen engines are less efficient than gas ones, and like ethanol, the production of hydrogen ends up being more of a problem. It would cost over $1 trillion to redo the infrastructure in the US for hydrogen for instance... while the 'infrastructure' for an electric car... well... you have electric cords, dont you?

This is the basis of electric car programs, as well as 'series hybrids' like the Chevy volt, Fisker, etc. 80% of all daily commutes are less than 50 miles in the US. So, the goal is to make a hybrid where the first 50 miles would be 'electric only' and could be charged at home overnight. Even for those who say, travel 60 miles a day, you could charge at work, or at worst, need to use a portion of a gallon of gas every day. To charge the Volt for instance, would cost about $.50-$1 a night for me in electricity, and kill my gas needs all together. Now thats a savings. Nissan, Mitsubishi, Renault, and other smaller makers have announced their plan to have 100% electric vehicles available by 2010. I want the Nissan myself... $25,000, 250-250 mile range, 0-60 in 4 seconds (electric motors are also much smaller and more powerful because they have constant torque from 1-12,000rpm),

hahnmeister read my blog
Jul 1, 2008 | 6:29 PM

, and a 10 minute recharge (new nano-safe batteries). It will have a lifetime warranty. GM quickly found out with the EV1 that upkeep costs on electric vehicles are minimal (which is why they killed the program)... pretty much just tires and check the battery cells every 25,000 miles or so. This digs into their profits that they get from upkeep of combustion engines (plugs, belts, oil, filters, etc) which electrics just dont have. Electrics lack transmissions (dont need em), and can go 1,000,000 miles without ever breaking down. They are dead cheap to make as well because they are so simple (the motors are in the wheels). The challenge has always been with the batteries, but recent advances in that are making that a non-issue. It will greatly change the auto industry as we know it as well, not to mention gas stations. My personal prediction is that all gas engines that get less than 40mpg will be up on blocks in 5 years.

hahnmeister read my blog
Jul 1, 2008 | 6:31 PM

Sorry, that Nissan is supposed to be 250-350 mile range.

mary-kohnke read my blog view my photos
Jul 6, 2008 | 11:31 AM

I would rather have the Honda. What I want to know is when these hybrids and electric cars need repair on these so called money saving parts. How much does that put you back in a hole? I will stick to a reg car.

hahnmeister read my blog
Jul 6, 2008 | 8:45 PM

Depends on the car. If the batteries on a Prius go now, they are about $3000, and its possible when you hit 100,000 miles because they are NiMH batteries. By the time the ones coming out now need replacing, they will be much cheaper, and last much longer (LiIon and Li Polymer and Nanosafe and A123)... so your replacement might only be $1000 or less. The cool thing with electric is how easy it will be down the road to retrofit these batteries to be even more powerful, or be plug-in style. The Lithium style batteries have a minimal environmental impact as well... ni nickel or other toxic chemicals.

Yeah, Id take the honda hybrid too.

bum76 read my blog view my photos
Jul 15, 2008 | 4:01 PM

Getting a small diesel is your best option. A friend of mine has a diesel VW Jetta and he get 55mpg.
Diesel is more expensive at the pump but the engines last a lot longer and millage is better than a hybrid.

you an also make diesel (bio-diesel ) if you have about 6 hours a month to make 60 gallons for about 70 cents a gallon.

4bearhunter read my blog
Jul 17, 2008 | 3:17 AM

Hey hahnmeister, you may want to check on Honda's website at the Clarity FCX. This is a hydrogen powered electric car that they claim will be available with a home hydrogen refueling station, (it produces your hydrogen) to eliminate your infrastructure issues for travel near your home,(unit has 300 mile range). The car is already available in California, but it sounds like the home refueling station is not ready for production yet. Let me know what you think.

4bearhunter read my blog
Jul 17, 2008 | 3:23 AM

Do your homework on the Ford Escape before buying one. I have heard some horror stories about mechanical problems with these vehicles, and VERY POOR response from Ford in trying to correct the problems.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




witiwebprod1

FOX 6 Web Producer. Entertainment junkie. I LOVE celebrity gossip. I listen to classic rock, jazz and whatever else tickles my fancy. I am a creative person and spend much of my free time being artsy or working on a variety of crafts. I love pina coladas and getting caught in the rain. DVR is my hero.

Member Since: 8/24/2006