ifilus's Blog

Oh please.

Would go through this "propaganda" video point by point, but, I have better things to do.

I will though, give you two reasons to vote Republican, or better yet, a conservative. Whether they have a D or a R by their name doesn't matter.

1) I don't want the government in charge of my healthcare.

2) I don't want the Supreme Court to continue to be able to make up law as it sees fit.

Or this one, just good humor. FWIW, I can make fun of Dems too though:

Mr. Colbydog: There is very little "truth" in Mr. Ifiluss posted video. It is little more than a collection of talking points and jaded perspectives.

Mr. Hahnmeister:

Judicial activism is the willingness of a court to create policy by interpreting laws broadly rather than strictly. For example, the "right to privacy," now considered now a constitutional right of U.S. citizens, is not stated explicitly in the Constitution. Rather, it is a court-created interpretation of the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments to the Constitution. Courts then decide to which cases the "right to privacy" principle is relevant. In a situation such a woman's right to choose abortion, the interpretation of the courts can create great controversy. Often a court can interpret a law so broadly that the scope of that law is radically changed.

Conflicting authorities
By interpreting laws broadly, an activist court can infringe on the authority of the legislative branches of government to make law. Court activism can result in two conflicts.
First, some people view court activism as a threat to democracy, a system based on the right of the people or their representatives (not the courts) to create laws.
Second, when the activism is present in a federal Supreme Court which has final authority over lower court rulings, the rights of the federal government can be promoted at the expense of the rights of states or provinces. (Recall that in the U.S., a disagreement about to the rights of states vs. the rights of the federal government resulted in a devastating civil war.)

http://www.clarku.edu

hey truthdoser... the Habeus Corpus is a foundation of our bill of rights, AND part of the agreement we signed with the United Nations... an unless your judges are doing alot of activism... we are bound to honor them.

never did finish five days of DemocracyNow.com I guess you've got much more important "truths" to dose out eh?

great on distant history, but fail to see the reality out your window?? cobbler's shoes have holes.

wow did you get hold of alice's funny looking glass or what... please, hold your breath.

exactly what do we deserve respect for, friend?
The way we treat our own citizens?
The way we respect our constitution?
The way we treat other nations?
The way we treat our planet?
The way we treat the animals and plants?

keep your "keen" eye on that statement about rights and privileges...
we're a hop skip and a McBump from becoming just that...
and still you'll say privatize... consolidate... and spread dumbocracy!

moral superiority... LOL!!!
...well maybe more than the catholic church's pedaphile priests...

regarding you're wussing out on the DN challenge.. I'll chalk it up to that truth you dose on... best windex that looking glass even your rabbit hole is becoming unclear.

Talk Radio... Views Considered News, Deception is Information, Lies instead of Laws...