MyFox
 

ifilus's Blog

by ifilus

Last Post 3 days, 18 hours Ago




Four more years!






11 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 11
Page 1 of 1
F0x6Fan read my blog view my photos
Jun 14, 2008 | 4:17 PM

I'm voting Republican because the thought of even "changing" my boxers is a struggle.

adoseoftruth read my blog
Jun 15, 2008 | 8:31 AM

Oh please.

Would go through this "propaganda" video point by point, but, I have better things to do.

I will though, give you two reasons to vote Republican, or better yet, a conservative. Whether they have a D or a R by their name doesn't matter.

1) I don't want the government in charge of my healthcare.

2) I don't want the Supreme Court to continue to be able to make up law as it sees fit.

hahnmeister read my blog
Jun 15, 2008 | 7:42 PM

Uh, since when does Supreme Court make up laws? Here's another good one:

hahnmeister read my blog
Jun 15, 2008 | 7:45 PM

Or this one, just good humor. FWIW, I can make fun of Dems too though:

ColbyDog read my blog view my photos
Jun 15, 2008 | 10:20 PM

oh please? If the gloves fit... you must admit!


truth hurts so much -you deny it... is your name peter?
Did I just hear a rooster crow again?

adoseoftruth read my blog
Jun 16, 2008 | 6:32 AM

Mr. Colbydog: There is very little "truth" in Mr. Ifiluss posted video. It is little more than a collection of talking points and jaded perspectives.

Mr. Hahnmeister:

Judicial activism is the willingness of a court to create policy by interpreting laws broadly rather than strictly. For example, the "right to privacy," now considered now a constitutional right of U.S. citizens, is not stated explicitly in the Constitution. Rather, it is a court-created interpretation of the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments to the Constitution. Courts then decide to which cases the "right to privacy" principle is relevant. In a situation such a woman's right to choose abortion, the interpretation of the courts can create great controversy. Often a court can interpret a law so broadly that the scope of that law is radically changed.

Conflicting authorities
By interpreting laws broadly, an activist court can infringe on the authority of the legislative branches of government to make law. Court activism can result in two conflicts.
First, some people view court activism as a threat to democracy, a system based on the right of the people or their representatives (not the courts) to create laws.
Second, when the activism is present in a federal Supreme Court which has final authority over lower court rulings, the rights of the federal government can be promoted at the expense of the rights of states or provinces. (Recall that in the U.S., a disagreement about to the rights of states vs. the rights of the federal government resulted in a devastating civil war.)

http://www.clarku.edu

adoseoftruth read my blog
Jun 16, 2008 | 6:38 AM

A very recent example of judicial activism is the "Habeus Corpus" ruling.

At the very minimun the ruling infringes upon the authority of both the Congress and Executive branch in "granting rights" to non US citizens.

Examples of judical activism can be found not just at the Federal level, but the state level as well.

ColbyDog read my blog view my photos
Jun 16, 2008 | 8:56 AM

hey truthdoser... the Habeus Corpus is a foundation of our bill of rights, AND part of the agreement we signed with the United Nations... an unless your judges are doing alot of activism... we are bound to honor them.

never did finish five days of DemocracyNow.com I guess you've got much more important "truths" to dose out eh?

great on distant history, but fail to see the reality out your window?? cobbler's shoes have holes.

adoseoftruth read my blog
Jun 16, 2008 | 9:04 PM

Yes it is in OUR Bill of Rights, that means you and me and all other CITIZENS of this country. Not sure why that is so hard to understand, or why people want to give/justify access to OUR, that means you and I, and all other CITIZENS of this country the same rights and priviledges via our legal system to folks who aren't CITIZENS, and suspected of being an "enemy combatant".

Goto another country, you will have whatever rights/priviledges they GRANT you. Don't see to many folks out there, certainly not Islamic Fascists, looking to treating us with such respect.

Maybe I am wrong and our this ruling will show the world our moral superiority and stop hating us because of our Constitutional rights and freedoms, and our willingness to share those rights even with suspected enemies........I'm not gonna hold my breath.

Re-read my last post on your democracynow.org challenge. I explained myself there.

ColbyDog read my blog view my photos
Jun 16, 2008 | 9:34 PM

wow did you get hold of alice's funny looking glass or what... please, hold your breath.

exactly what do we deserve respect for, friend?
The way we treat our own citizens?
The way we respect our constitution?
The way we treat other nations?
The way we treat our planet?
The way we treat the animals and plants?

keep your "keen" eye on that statement about rights and privileges...
we're a hop skip and a McBump from becoming just that...
and still you'll say privatize... consolidate... and spread dumbocracy!

moral superiority... LOL!!!
...well maybe more than the catholic church's pedaphile priests...

regarding you're wussing out on the DN challenge.. I'll chalk it up to that truth you dose on... best windex that looking glass even your rabbit hole is becoming unclear.

Talk Radio... Views Considered News, Deception is Information, Lies instead of Laws...

ColbyDog read my blog view my photos
Jun 16, 2008 | 9:51 PM

American Flag

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




ifilus

I am a MyFoxLocal user who has written.

Member Since: 6/28/2007